Back in December of 2015, the Daily Express published an article wondering if this recent discovery on the Moon could be the final proof needed to convince Apollo deniers we actually landed there back in the late '60's and early '70's. (That's 1960's and 1970's, in case anyone is reading this in the 22nd century.) The article explains how "NASA has released a photograph confirming the exact location of the crash site of part of the Apollo 16 spacecraft that landed on the Moon."

​Ever heard someone answering a question, that sounded like they were answering the question, but not really? I didn't mean for this blog to become a "Moon Hoax" site, but I just can't help it.

Here's a nifty little website from our friends at NASA, called "Ask an Astrophysicist", tackling all the tough issues regarding space. Someone came along and had the audacity to ask how astronauts could survive the radiation of the Van Allen Belts (like we didn't already solve that problem back in the '60s).

If you’ve read this post, you might have detected a bit of doubt from this author about the official story of the Moon landings back in the late 1960′s and early 70′s.

If you were surprised by that revelation, then maybe you haven’t seen the latest evidence NASA has offered as proof the Moon landings were real.

In my lifetime I have learned that you can divide the world’s population into two groups–those who believe the United States landed men on the Moon (back in the late 1960s) and those who don’t. The former of which is in the majority, and the latter is…well, the minority.

But really, who’s saying we didn’t land men on the moon? Well, NASA apparently.