Futile Work
  • Home
  • News
    • Articles Of Interest
    • Numbers In The News
    • Life and Humanity
    • Quotes
    • Futile Updates
  • Curio
    • The Wonder of Lasers
    • Japan 2011 Psyop
    • Know Your Rights
    • Masonic Symbols and the LDS Temple
    • The Nun's Story
    • Special Edition
    • Explosion On The Launch Pad
  • Archive
    • Dave McGowan
    • Document Archive
    • Multi Media
    • Time For A Laugh
  • Blog

Articles of Interest

DEA agent steals woman's identity and photos to lure in suspects on Facebook

10/8/2014

 
by Lisa Vaas

Picture
The US government is claiming that an agent had the right to set up a Facebook account and to impersonate a young woman using information it swiped from her seized mobile phone after she was arrested.

The woman, Sondra Arquiett (spelled in some court documents as Arquiette), was surprised when a friend asked her about photos she was posting on her Facebook page.

One showed her with her legs open, posed on the hood of a BMW; another was of her clad only in underwear; another one showed her face-down on the BMW, legs nonchalantly crossed in the air above her butt, captioned with this comment:

At least I still have this car!
That's strange, she thought at the time, given that she'd never even set up a Facebook page.

That's when Arquiett first found out that her identity had been hijacked by a US Drug Enforcement Administration special agent by the name of Timothy Sinnigen.

Arquiett, who learned about the bogus account in 2010 when she was going by the name of Sondra Prince, sued.

Now, as BuzzFeed reports, the Department of Justice (DOJ) is claiming that Sinnigen had the right to impersonate the woman by taking out a Facebook page in her name (and against Facebook's terms of service), to ransack the woman's seized mobile phone, and to post photographs found thereon - including not only photos of Arquiett, but also a photo of her young son and niece.

The agent didn't stop there.

Sinnigen not only accepted friend requests on her behalf. He also reached out to a known fugitive, sending him a friend request, disguised as coming from the bogus Prince account.

Sinnigen's lawyer said in the court filing that Prince had "implicitly consented" to all this by handing over access to her mobile phone and all its data - friends' information, photos and all - thereby consenting to "aid in ... ongoing criminal investigations."

Arquiett gave up her First Amendment Right to privacy when she gave up her phone, the Feds are claiming:

Plaintiff does not have a First Amendment Right to Privacy in the photographs contained on her cell phone.

Plaintiff relinquished any expectation of privacy she may have had to the photographs contained on her cell phone.

Plaintiff consented to the search of her cell phone.
The "Sondra Prince" page was still visible on Facebook at the time that BuzzFeed wrote up the story on Monday, but the page has since been removed by Facebook who said "We removed the profile because it violates our community standards."

Arquiett's attorney claimed in the lawsuit that the counterfeit page, along with her intimate photos, was up for at least three months.

This caused her "fear and great emotional distress," according to the court papers, particularly given that the ruse made it look like she was a narc:

...by posing as her on Facebook, Sinnegen had created the appearance that Plaintiff was willfully cooperating in his investigation of the narcotics trafficking ring, thereby placing her in danger.
BuzzFeed spoke with a number of privacy experts, all of whom called the government's argument a dangerous precedent - particularly when you're talking about the treasure trove of data we keep on our phones.

Anita L. Allen, a professor at University of Pennsylvania Law School, likened it to the search of a home that, in spite of being done with consent of the homeowner, has gone way beyond the norm:

I may allow someone to come into my home and search, but that doesn't mean they can take the photos from my coffee table and post them online.
According to the DOJ, Sondra Arquiett had consented to a search of her phone.

But it's hard to imagine that the notion of consent would extend so far as to allow an identity to be usurped - particularly when such a counterfeit could put the subject in danger of violent retribution from criminals who think she's working with the Feds to bust them all.

I agree with Elizabeth Joh, a professor at the University of California, Davis, School of Law, who called this "a dangerous expansion of the idea of consent."

What's particularly nasty is the idea that this DEA agent didn't tell Ms Arquiett that she was being used in this manner. She was taken completely unaware by the ruse.

On so many levels, both humanitarian and in terms of privacy protection and limiting this extremely stretched definition of "consent", I hope the government's argument that it's OK to hijack somebody's identity gets decisively and quickly slapped down.

https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2014/10/08/dea-agent-steals-womans-identity-and-photos-to-lure-in-suspects-on-facebook/

jump to top | return to articles home

Comments are closed.
    Articles Home

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    November 2020
    June 2020
    November 2019
    October 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    December 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    October 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    May 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    July 2011
    May 2010
    April 2010
    May 2006
    December 2004
    October 2003
    June 2002
    September 2001
    February 2001
    February 1998

New Here?

Updates
About

Miscellany

​Contact
Disclaimer

Search

  • Home
  • News
    • Articles Of Interest
    • Numbers In The News
    • Life and Humanity
    • Quotes
    • Futile Updates
  • Curio
    • The Wonder of Lasers
    • Japan 2011 Psyop
    • Know Your Rights
    • Masonic Symbols and the LDS Temple
    • The Nun's Story
    • Special Edition
    • Explosion On The Launch Pad
  • Archive
    • Dave McGowan
    • Document Archive
    • Multi Media
    • Time For A Laugh
  • Blog